Ada Access GroupFind and Fix Website Accessibility Barriers

Scan across pages for automatically detectable WCAG 2.2 A/AA barriers. Need a human look? Request the Free Expert Risk Review separately.

Multi-page crawl · axe-core + IBM Equal Access · No account required

See Sample Report Request comprehensive audit

Two free starting points — they are not the same service

The instant scan is automated. The expert risk review is human and takes business days.

Results in seconds

Instant Automated Scan

Enter your URL. The scanner crawls multiple pages and flags machine-detectable WCAG issues. It is not a human review and not an audit report.

Scan now

1–3 business days

Free Expert Risk Review

A specialist spot-checks navigation, forms, and keyboard access, then tells you what to prioritize. It is not the full audit.

Request expert review

How It Works

From scan to accessible website

Automation finds potential issues. Our specialists verify them. Our developers fix them. You get a more accessible website.

Instant Automated Scan

Enter your URL. The scanner crawls pages, renders them in a browser, and checks WCAG 2.2 A/AA with axe-core and IBM Equal Access — not a human review.

Review

See potential accessibility barriers organized by severity — Critical, Serious, and Moderate — with clear explanations of user impact.

Fix

Our specialists verify findings and remediate confirmed issues. We deliver developer-ready code fixes — not just a list of problems.

Monitor

Track your accessibility progress over time. Retest after fixes, monitor new content, and maintain your WCAG compliance posture.

Why automated scan isn't enough: automated testing catches approximately 30–40% of WCAG failures. Many barriers — keyboard traps, focus management, screen reader labeling — require a human to verify. That's where our specialists come in.

Website scanner

More than a one-page accessibility check

Multi-page crawling, axe-core + IBM Equal Access, and grouped unique issues. No account required.

Scan a website See how the scanner works →

Up to 40 pages · WCAG 2.2 AA by default · Not a compliance certificate

What You Actually Get

Clear findings, not just error codes

Every finding comes with plain-language impact explanation, the WCAG criterion it relates to, and a developer-ready recommendation — not just a pass/fail checklist.

Finding #A11Y-018 · Real example from an auditHigh

Form Input Missing Accessible Label

Potential impact: Screen-reader users may not understand what information the field requires, making the form unusable for people using assistive technology.

WCAG 1.3.1 — Info and Relationships

Affected /contact/

Before

After

<label for="phone">Phone</label> <input id="phone" type="tel" />

Every report includes

Severity and affected users

Know what's urgent versus what can wait.

WCAG criterion reference

Every finding maps to a specific, citable standard.

Developer-ready code fix

Before-and-after snippets your team can ship directly.

View Full Sample Report

Industries We Serve

Common barriers by industry

Every industry has its own accessibility failure patterns. We know them.

Dental Practices

Appointment forms, patient portals, and insurance info must be accessible.

Online bookingInsurance verification

Restaurants

Menus, reservations, and delivery integrations are common failure points.

Digital menusReservation widgets

Healthcare

Patient portals and telehealth interfaces carry elevated risk.

Patient portalsTelehealth UIs

Auto Dealers

Inventory, financing calculators, and service booking are commonly cited.

Inventory filtersFinance forms

Hotels

Booking flows and room selection must meet WCAG to avoid ADA exposure.

Booking flowsRoom filters

Professional Services

Contact forms, document downloads, and service pages must be accessible.

Contact formsDocument PDFs

Discuss your industry requirements

Federal website accessibility lawsuits by state

2025 ADA Title III Website Lawsuit Data

2025 Statistics

3,117

Federal ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuits counted by Seyfarth Shaw in 2025

Top States

1New York
1,021
2Florida
961
3Illinois
585
4Minnesota
162
5Pennsylvania
137

View all states as a table

Federal ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuits by state, 2025. Source: Seyfarth Shaw.
Rank	State	Cases	Share
1	New York	1,021	32.8%
2	Florida	961	30.8%
3	Illinois	585	18.8%
4	Minnesota	162	5.2%
5	Pennsylvania	137	4.4%
6	Missouri	86	2.8%
7	Massachusetts	57	1.8%
8	Wisconsin	47	1.5%
9	Indiana	34	1.1%
10	New Jersey	22	0.71%
11	California	4	0.13%
12	District of Columbia	1	0.03%
—	Alabama	0	0.0%
—	Alaska	0	0.0%
—	Arizona	0	0.0%
—	Arkansas	0	0.0%
—	Colorado	0	0.0%
—	Connecticut	0	0.0%
—	Delaware	0	0.0%
—	Georgia	0	0.0%
—	Hawaii	0	0.0%
—	Idaho	0	0.0%
—	Iowa	0	0.0%
—	Kansas	0	0.0%
—	Kentucky	0	0.0%
—	Louisiana	0	0.0%
—	Maine	0	0.0%
—	Maryland	0	0.0%
—	Michigan	0	0.0%
—	Mississippi	0	0.0%
—	Montana	0	0.0%
—	Nebraska	0	0.0%
—	Nevada	0	0.0%
—	New Hampshire	0	0.0%
—	New Mexico	0	0.0%
—	North Carolina	0	0.0%
—	North Dakota	0	0.0%
—	Ohio	0	0.0%
—	Oklahoma	0	0.0%
—	Oregon	0	0.0%
—	Rhode Island	0	0.0%
—	South Carolina	0	0.0%
—	South Dakota	0	0.0%
—	Tennessee	0	0.0%
—	Texas	0	0.0%
—	Utah	0	0.0%
—	Vermont	0	0.0%
—	Virginia	0	0.0%
—	Washington	0	0.0%
—	West Virginia	0	0.0%
—	Wyoming	0	0.0%

This map covers federal website-accessibility filings only. It does not include state-court litigation or demand letters. Hover a state on the map for details, or open the table for the full dataset.

About

Making the digital world accessible for everyone

ADA Access Group provides comprehensive ADA compliance services to ensure your website reaches all users — combining automated scanning, specialist review, and developer-ready remediation.

2500 Parkview Drive, Hallandale Beach, FL 33009

What clients value most

Not hype — practical outcomes: clarity, priorities, and measurable improvement.

1–2 weeks

Typical remediation window

Depends on scope, codebase, and team availability

Clear priorities

Severity-based findings

Fix what matters first: forms, navigation, keyboard access

Documentation

Progress you can show

Useful for internal stakeholders and vendor coordination

Better UX

For all users

Accessibility improvements often enhance usability overall

Verifiable case snapshots

We do not publish anonymous quotes. When a company can be named, we show their words, the work, and the outcome.

Multi-location hospitality · South Florida

Thompson Restaurants

thompsonrestaurants.com

We had a great experience working with the ADA Access Group team on the accessibility review for Thompson Restaurants. From the beginning, they made the entire process clear and easy to navigate.
Their team was thorough in identifying accessibility issues across the website and, more importantly, provided clear and practical guidance on how each issue should be addressed. We appreciated that their recommendations were specific and actionable, and not simply handing over a report and leaving us to figure out the next steps.
Communication was always responsive and professional. I would definitely recommend ADA Access Group to businesses and development teams looking for knowledgeable, reliable support with website accessibility and WCAG compliance.

Testimonial from Thompson Restaurants

Work: Website accessibility review of hospitality templates: navigation, menus, reservations, and ordering flows, scored against WCAG 2.2 AA (WCAG 2.1 AA if a contract requires it).
Result: A prioritized findings list the operations team can hand to developers: what blocks guests first, which WCAG criteria apply, and what to fix before a full remediationsprint.

WCAG 2.2 AA by default; WCAG 2.1 AA when a contract or regulation requires it.