Find and Fix Website Accessibility Barriers

Instant Automated Scan of your website for WCAG and ADA barriers. Need a human look? Request the Free Expert Risk Review separately.

Instant Automated Scan · Results in seconds · No account required

See Sample ReportRequest comprehensive audit

Two free starting points — they are not the same service

The instant scan is automated. The expert risk review is human and takes business days.

Results in seconds

Instant Automated Scan

Enter your URL on the homepage. The scanner flags machine-detectable issues. It is not a human review and not an audit report.

Scan now

1–3 business days

Free Expert Risk Review

A specialist spot-checks navigation, forms, and keyboard access, then tells you what to prioritize. It is not the full audit.

Request expert review
How It Works

From scan to accessible website

Automation finds potential issues. Our specialists verify them. Our developers fix them. You get a more accessible website.

01

Instant Automated Scan

Enter your website URL. The automated scan flags potential WCAG and ADA barriers in seconds — not a human review.

02

Review

See potential accessibility barriers organized by severity — Critical, Serious, and Moderate — with clear explanations of user impact.

03

Fix

Our specialists verify findings and remediate confirmed issues. We deliver developer-ready code fixes — not just a list of problems.

04

Monitor

Track your accessibility progress over time. Retest after fixes, monitor new content, and maintain your WCAG compliance posture.

Why automated scan isn't enough: automated testing catches approximately 30–40% of WCAG failures. Many barriers — keyboard traps, focus management, screen reader labeling — require a human to verify. That's where our specialists come in.

Instant Automated Scan

See machine-detectable barriers in seconds

Instant Automated Scan. No account required. For a human spot-check, request the Free Expert Risk Review.

Start Instant Scan

Instant Automated Scan · WCAG 2.2 AA by default · No account required

What You Actually Get

Clear findings, not just error codes

Every finding comes with plain-language impact explanation, the WCAG criterion it relates to, and a developer-ready recommendation — not just a pass/fail checklist.

Finding #A11Y-018 · Real example from an auditHigh

Form Input Missing Accessible Label

Potential impact: Screen-reader users may not understand what information the field requires, making the form unusable for people using assistive technology.

WCAG 1.3.1 — Info and Relationships
Affected /contact/
Before
<input type="tel" name="phone" />
After
<label for="phone">Phone</label> <input id="phone" type="tel" />

Every report includes

Severity and affected users
Know what's urgent versus what can wait.
WCAG criterion reference
Every finding maps to a specific, citable standard.
Developer-ready code fix
Before-and-after snippets your team can ship directly.
View Full Sample Report
Industries We Serve

Common barriers by industry

Every industry has its own accessibility failure patterns. We know them.

Dental treatment room with patient chair and overhead light

Dental Practices

Appointment forms, patient portals, and insurance info must be accessible.

Online bookingInsurance verification
Restaurant dining room with set tables

Restaurants

Menus, reservations, and delivery integrations are common failure points.

Digital menusReservation widgets
Healthcare clinic hallway and reception

Healthcare

Patient portals and telehealth interfaces carry elevated risk.

Patient portalsTelehealth UIs
Automobile dealership showroom

Auto Dealers

Inventory, financing calculators, and service booking are commonly cited.

Inventory filtersFinance forms
Hotel lobby and check-in area

Hotels

Booking flows and room selection must meet WCAG to avoid ADA exposure.

Booking flowsRoom filters
Professional office meeting space

Professional Services

Contact forms, document downloads, and service pages must be accessible.

Contact formsDocument PDFs
Discuss your industry requirements
Federal website accessibility lawsuits by state

2025 ADA Title III Website Lawsuit Data

2025 Statistics

3,117

Federal ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuits counted by Seyfarth Shaw in 2025

Top States

  1. 1New York1,021
  2. 2Florida961
  3. 3Illinois585
  4. 4Minnesota162
  5. 5Pennsylvania137
View all states as a table
Federal ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuits by state, 2025. Source: Seyfarth Shaw.
RankStateCasesShare
1New York1,02132.8%
2Florida96130.8%
3Illinois58518.8%
4Minnesota1625.2%
5Pennsylvania1374.4%
6Missouri862.8%
7Massachusetts571.8%
8Wisconsin471.5%
9Indiana341.1%
10New Jersey220.71%
11California40.13%
12District of Columbia10.03%
—Alabama00.0%
—Alaska00.0%
—Arizona00.0%
—Arkansas00.0%
—Colorado00.0%
—Connecticut00.0%
—Delaware00.0%
—Georgia00.0%
—Hawaii00.0%
—Idaho00.0%
—Iowa00.0%
—Kansas00.0%
—Kentucky00.0%
—Louisiana00.0%
—Maine00.0%
—Maryland00.0%
—Michigan00.0%
—Mississippi00.0%
—Montana00.0%
—Nebraska00.0%
—Nevada00.0%
—New Hampshire00.0%
—New Mexico00.0%
—North Carolina00.0%
—North Dakota00.0%
—Ohio00.0%
—Oklahoma00.0%
—Oregon00.0%
—Rhode Island00.0%
—South Carolina00.0%
—South Dakota00.0%
—Tennessee00.0%
—Texas00.0%
—Utah00.0%
—Vermont00.0%
—Virginia00.0%
—Washington00.0%
—West Virginia00.0%
—Wyoming00.0%

This map covers federal website-accessibility filings only. It does not include state-court litigation or demand letters. Hover a state on the map for details, or open the table for the full dataset.

ADA Access Group office reception
About

Making the digital world accessible for everyone

ADA Access Group provides comprehensive ADA compliance services to ensure your website reaches all users — combining automated scanning, specialist review, and developer-ready remediation.

2500 Parkview Drive, Hallandale Beach, FL 33009

What clients value most

Not hype — practical outcomes: clarity, priorities, and measurable improvement.

1–2 weeks
Typical remediation window
Depends on scope, codebase, and team availability
Clear priorities
Severity-based findings
Fix what matters first: forms, navigation, keyboard access
Documentation
Progress you can show
Useful for internal stakeholders and vendor coordination
Better UX
For all users
Accessibility improvements often enhance usability overall

Verifiable case snapshots

We do not publish anonymous quotes. When a company and scope can be named, we show the problem, the work, and the outcome.

Multi-location hospitality · South Florida

Thompson Restaurants

thompsonrestaurants.com
Problem
Guest-facing restaurant websites mix menus, reservations, and online ordering. Those templates are a common source of keyboard, labeling, and form barriers — especially across brands such as Matchbox in Sunrise and Fort Lauderdale.
Work
Website accessibility review of hospitality templates: navigation, menus, reservations, and ordering flows, scored against WCAG 2.2 AA (WCAG 2.1 AA if a contract requires it).
Result
A prioritized findings list the operations team can hand to developers: what blocks guests first, which WCAG criteria apply, and what to fix before a full remediationsprint.

WCAG 2.2 AA by default; WCAG 2.1 AA when a contract or regulation requires it.